MSBHF vs. WM
MSBHF (Mitsubishi Corp) and WM (Waste Management, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — MSBHF in Conglomerates, WM in Waste Management. Over the past 10 years, MSBHF returned 23.29%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for WM. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSBHF vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSBHF achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly higher than WM's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MSBHF has outperformed WM with an annualized return of 23.29%, while WM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.51% annualized return.
MSBHF
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 43.17%
- 6M
- 37.76%
- 1Y
- 64.15%
- 3Y*
- 35.22%
- 5Y*
- 32.24%
- 10Y*
- 23.29%
WM
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- -7.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.51%
MSBHF vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSBHF Mitsubishi Corp | 43.17% | 45.58% | 4.78% | 55.88% | 4.23% | 31.37% | 5.16% | -5.35% | 12.97% | 19.70% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | -0.38% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSBHF and WM is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2007 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
MSBHF:
$120.39B
WM:
$88.16B
MSBHF:
$210.62
WM:
$6.91
MSBHF:
0.15
WM:
31.55
MSBHF:
0.11
WM:
2.58
MSBHF:
0.01
WM:
3.47
MSBHF:
0.01
WM:
8.80
MSBHF:
$19.02T
WM:
$25.41B
MSBHF:
$1.66T
WM:
$5.61B
MSBHF:
$1.04T
WM:
$6.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSBHF vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank
MSBHF
WM
MSBHF vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSBHF | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.94 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | -0.46 | +4.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.16 | -1.04 | +14.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSBHF | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | -0.43 | +2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.58 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.80 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.36 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
MSBHF vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSBHF drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBHF and WM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSBHF | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -77.85% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.05% | -17.04% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.60% | -18.14% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -18.14% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.81% | -30.07% | -7.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.44% | -11.21% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -17.69% | -6.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 7.92% | -3.03% |
Volatility
MSBHF vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 5.88%. This indicates that MSBHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSBHF | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.99% | 5.88% | +9.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.46% | 13.57% | +12.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.27% | 18.59% | +14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.09% | 18.53% | +12.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.50% | 19.49% | +9.01% |
Dividends
MSBHF vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
MSBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than WM's 1.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSBHF Mitsubishi Corp | 2.19% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 3.46% | 3.84% | 5.07% | 4.56% | 3.64% | 1.42% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.57% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
MSBHF vs. WM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsubishi Corp and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MSBHF vs. WM - Profitability Comparison
MSBHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported a gross profit of 457.61B and revenue of 5.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.7%.
WM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MSBHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported an operating income of 108.14B and revenue of 5.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
WM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
MSBHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported a net income of 193.75B and revenue of 5.27T, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
WM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSBHF and WM have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSBHF has higher volatility (14.99%) compared to WM (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSBHF dropped -66.05% vs WM's -77.85%.
MSBHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSBHF and WM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer