MSBHF vs. RSG
MSBHF (Mitsubishi Corp) and RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — MSBHF in Conglomerates, RSG in Waste Management. Over the past 10 years, MSBHF returned 23.29%/yr vs 17.30%/yr for RSG. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSBHF vs. RSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSBHF achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly higher than RSG's -3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, MSBHF has outperformed RSG with an annualized return of 23.29%, while RSG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.30% annualized return.
MSBHF
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- 43.17%
- 6M
- 37.76%
- 1Y
- 64.15%
- 3Y*
- 35.22%
- 5Y*
- 32.24%
- 10Y*
- 23.29%
RSG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -4.64%
- 1Y
- -19.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 17.30%
MSBHF vs. RSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSBHF Mitsubishi Corp | 43.17% | 45.58% | 4.78% | 55.88% | 4.23% | 31.37% | 5.16% | -5.35% | 12.97% | 19.70% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -3.09% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSBHF and RSG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2007 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
MSBHF:
$120.39B
RSG:
$63.12B
MSBHF:
$210.62
RSG:
$6.98
MSBHF:
0.15
RSG:
29.26
MSBHF:
0.11
RSG:
2.06
MSBHF:
0.01
RSG:
3.80
MSBHF:
0.01
RSG:
5.27
MSBHF:
$19.02T
RSG:
$16.70B
MSBHF:
$1.66T
RSG:
$3.80B
MSBHF:
$1.04T
RSG:
$4.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSBHF vs. RSG — Risk / Return Rank
MSBHF
RSG
MSBHF vs. RSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) and Republic Services, Inc. (RSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSBHF | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | -1.08 | +3.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | -1.46 | +4.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.83 | +0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | -0.92 | +4.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.16 | -1.51 | +14.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSBHF | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | -1.08 | +3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.82 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.91 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.39 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
MSBHF vs. RSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSBHF drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, roughly equal to the maximum RSG drawdown of -65.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBHF and RSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSBHF | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -65.99% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.05% | -21.34% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.60% | -22.54% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -22.54% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.81% | -34.02% | -3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.44% | -20.01% | +7.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -11.83% | -12.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 13.65% | -8.76% |
Volatility
MSBHF vs. RSG - Volatility Comparison
Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) has a higher volatility of 14.99% compared to Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) at 6.59%. This indicates that MSBHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSBHF | RSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.99% | 6.59% | +8.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.46% | 13.23% | +13.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.27% | 18.10% | +15.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.09% | 18.06% | +13.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.50% | 19.03% | +9.47% |
Dividends
MSBHF vs. RSG - Dividend Comparison
MSBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than RSG's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSBHF Mitsubishi Corp | 2.19% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 3.46% | 3.84% | 5.07% | 4.56% | 3.64% | 1.42% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.20% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
Financials
MSBHF vs. RSG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsubishi Corp and Republic Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MSBHF vs. RSG - Profitability Comparison
MSBHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported a gross profit of 457.61B and revenue of 5.27T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.7%.
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MSBHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported an operating income of 108.14B and revenue of 5.27T, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
MSBHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Corp reported a net income of 193.75B and revenue of 5.27T, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSBHF and RSG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSBHF has higher volatility (14.99%) compared to RSG (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSBHF dropped -66.05% vs RSG's -65.99%.
MSBHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSBHF and RSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer