PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSBHF vs. STHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSBHF vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSBHF achieves a 43.17% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 209.56% return.


MSBHF

1D
4.98%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
43.17%
6M
37.76%
1Y
64.15%
3Y*
35.22%
5Y*
32.24%
10Y*
23.29%

STHH

1D
0.46%
1M
45.30%
YTD
209.56%
6M
210.55%
1Y
209.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSBHF vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSBHF
Mitsubishi Corp
43.17%25.45%
STHH
STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged
209.56%16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MSBHF and STHH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSBHF vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSBHF
MSBHF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
MSBHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSBHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSBHF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MSBHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSBHF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

STHH
STHH Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSBHF vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSBHFSTHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.60

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

6.23

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.16

14.15

-0.99

MSBHF vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSBHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSBHF and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSBHFSTHHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

4.20

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

4.44

-4.14

Drawdowns

MSBHF vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSBHF drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBHF and STHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSBHFSTHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-33.89%

-32.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.05%

-33.89%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.44%

0.00%

-12.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.37%

-10.46%

-13.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

14.90%

-10.01%

Volatility

MSBHF vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mitsubishi Corp (MSBHF) is 14.99%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.33%. This indicates that MSBHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSBHFSTHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.99%

20.33%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.46%

36.77%

-10.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.27%

50.39%

-17.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.09%

49.44%

-18.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.50%

49.44%

-20.94%

Dividends

MSBHF vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

MSBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than STHH's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MSBHF
Mitsubishi Corp
2.19%3.05%3.54%3.03%3.46%3.84%5.07%4.56%3.64%1.42%1.39%
STHH
STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged
0.55%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSBHF and STHH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STHH has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to MSBHF (14.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSBHF dropped -66.05% vs STHH's -33.89%.

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSBHF and STHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer