PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRVU vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRVU vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF (MRVU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MRVU

1D
10.26%
1M
215.52%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
12.78%
1M
23.20%
YTD
-55.34%
6M
-70.69%
1Y
-21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRVU vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MRVU and HOOG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRVU vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRVU

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRVU vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF (MRVU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MRVU vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRVUHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1,774.55

0.41

+1,774.14

Drawdowns

MRVU vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVU drawdown since its inception was -21.03%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVU and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRVUHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.03%

-86.94%

+65.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-79.17%

+79.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-37.70%

+33.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.46%

Volatility

MRVU vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRVUHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

175.19%

137.25%

+37.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

175.19%

145.07%

+30.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

175.19%

145.07%

+30.12%

MRVU vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRVU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRVU vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

MRVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than HOOG's 27.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MRVU and HOOG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MRVU.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 0.02% for MRVU.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MRVU and 0.75% for HOOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRVU and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer