MRVU vs. TMF
MRVU (Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MRVU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRVU charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
MRVU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRVU
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- -35.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -10.90%
- YTD
- -8.94%
- 1Y
- -4.05%
- 3Y*
- -19.45%
- 5Y*
- -32.83%
- 10Y*
- -18.06%
MRVU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRVU Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF | 469.18% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -12.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRVU and TMF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRVU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
MRVU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMF
MRVU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF (MRVU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRVU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRVU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRVU drawdown since its inception was -54.46%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVU and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRVU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.46% | -92.89% | +38.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.68% | -92.46% | +39.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -43.90% | +32.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.78% | — |
Volatility
MRVU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRVU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 193.56% | 27.83% | +165.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.56% | 46.53% | +147.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 193.56% | 43.76% | +149.80% |
MRVU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRVU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRVU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
MRVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than TMF's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVU Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.34% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRVU and TMF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MRVU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MRVU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.29% for MRVU.
MRVU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. MRVU tracks Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MRVU and 1.01% for TMF.
Find the right allocation for MRVU and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer