MRVL vs. LVHD

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Over the past 10 years, MRVL returned 35.00%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for LVHD. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MRVL vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 121.91% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 14.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MRVL has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 35.00%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.26% annualized return.

MRVL

• 1D: -8.71%
• 1M: -32.41%
• 6M: 134.44%
• YTD: 121.91%
• 1Y: 166.34%
• 3Y*: 43.32%
• 5Y*: 28.87%
• 10Y*: 35.00%

LVHD

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 3.49%
• 6M: 10.72%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 1Y: 16.67%
• 3Y*: 10.97%
• 5Y*: 7.75%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRVL vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.	121.91%	-22.82%	83.79%	63.68%	-57.48%	84.62%	80.25%	65.74%	-23.62%	56.89%
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	14.62%	7.50%	10.18%	-0.95%	-1.82%	26.90%	-1.28%	22.91%	-5.58%	14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MRVL and LVHD is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015	0.21

The correlation between MRVL and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MRVL vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRVL

MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 91
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LVHD

LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 60
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRVL vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRVL	LVHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.61	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.42	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.28	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.14	2.71	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	6.72	+6.28

MRVL vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRVL Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRVL and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MRVL vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and LVHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRVL	LVHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.60%	-37.32%	-54.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.48%	-6.17%	-34.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.79%	-14.29%	-46.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.88%	-16.75%	-45.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.88%	-37.32%	-24.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.48%	0.00%	-40.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.64%	-4.02%	-42.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.85%	2.49%	+10.36%

Volatility

MRVL vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 27.93% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.92%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRVL	LVHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.93%	4.92%	+23.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.81%	8.10%	+54.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.00%	10.44%	+65.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.27%	13.02%	+50.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.71%	15.56%	+37.15%

Dividends

MRVL vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than LVHD's 3.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF	3.17%	3.35%	4.23%	3.55%	3.30%	2.56%	3.27%	3.30%	3.82%	3.33%	2.48%	0.00%
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.	0.13%	0.28%	0.22%	0.40%	0.65%	0.21%	0.50%	0.90%	1.48%	1.12%	1.73%	2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRVL and LVHD in my portfolio?

MRVL and LVHD have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRVL or LVHD?

MRVL has higher volatility (27.93%) compared to LVHD (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.