PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRNA vs. EMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRNA vs. EMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRNA achieves a 104.88% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 2.51% return.


MRNA

1D
-0.95%
1M
28.88%
YTD
104.88%
6M
84.49%
1Y
125.45%
3Y*
-20.11%
5Y*
-22.77%
10Y*

EMB

1D
0.32%
1M
1.90%
YTD
2.51%
6M
2.23%
1Y
10.51%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRNA vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
104.88%-29.08%-58.19%-44.63%-29.28%143.11%434.10%28.09%-30.59%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
2.51%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MRNA and EMB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2018

0.21

The correlation between MRNA and EMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRNA vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRNA
MRNA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MRNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNA Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRNA vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRNAEMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.34

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

9.97

-3.00

MRNA vs. EMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the EMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRNA and EMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRNA vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRNA drawdown since its inception was -95.38%, which is greater than EMB's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRNA and EMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRNAEMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.38%

-34.70%

-60.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.51%

-4.51%

-31.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.58%

-7.95%

-78.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.38%

-28.74%

-66.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.53%

-0.17%

-87.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.17%

-5.04%

-52.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.07%

1.06%

+17.01%

Volatility

MRNA vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison

Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) has a higher volatility of 21.75% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 1.80%. This indicates that MRNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRNAEMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.75%

1.80%

+19.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.42%

4.69%

+45.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.45%

5.69%

+60.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.74%

9.76%

+56.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.25%

9.96%

+62.29%

Dividends

MRNA vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison

MRNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.02%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRNA and EMB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNA has higher volatility (21.75%) compared to EMB (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRNA dropped -95.38% vs EMB's -34.70%.

MRNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRNA and EMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer