PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMB vs. VWOB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMB vs. VWOB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than VWOB's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, EMB has underperformed VWOB with an annualized return of 3.30%, while VWOB has yielded a comparatively higher 3.50% annualized return.


EMB

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.57%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.21%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
9.37%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
3.30%

VWOB

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.64%
YTD
1.92%
6M
1.94%
1Y
10.08%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
3.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMB vs. VWOB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
2.18%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-5.47%10.28%
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
1.92%13.49%5.20%10.68%-17.39%-1.80%5.65%14.46%-2.92%8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EMB and VWOB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.91

The correlation between EMB and VWOB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMB vs. VWOB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VWOB
VWOB Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VWOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWOB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VWOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWOB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMB vs. VWOB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMBVWOBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.26

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.26

9.52

+0.75

EMB vs. VWOB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the VWOB Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMB and VWOB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMB vs. VWOB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than VWOB's maximum drawdown of -26.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and VWOB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBVWOBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-26.98%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-4.48%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-7.71%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-26.98%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-26.98%

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.53%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-4.79%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.06%

0.00%

Volatility

EMB vs. VWOB - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) have volatilities of 1.78% and 1.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMBVWOBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.74%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

4.34%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

5.29%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

9.19%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

9.35%

+0.61%

EMB vs. VWOB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VWOB's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMB vs. VWOB - Dividend Comparison

EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than VWOB's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.04%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
5.82%5.92%6.08%5.50%5.30%4.04%4.18%4.58%4.52%4.61%4.71%4.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, EMB and VWOB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EMB has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to VWOB (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMB dropped -34.70% vs VWOB's -26.98%.

On 10-year performance, VWOB leads with 3.50% vs 3.30% for EMB. On fees, VWOB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VWOB has performed better with a 3.50% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWOB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMB.

VWOB has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 5.04% for EMB.

EMB tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index, while VWOB tracks Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Government RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMB and 0.15% for VWOB.

VWOB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMB and VWOB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer