EMB vs. EMLC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC).
EMB and EMLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. EMLC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both EMB and EMLC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMB or EMLC.
Performance
EMB vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's -1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EMB has outperformed EMLC with an annualized return of 2.45%, while EMLC has yielded a comparatively lower -0.84% annualized return.
EMB
5.86%
-1.69%
3.69%
12.86%
0.29%
2.45%
EMLC
-1.69%
-2.69%
-0.80%
1.23%
-1.26%
-0.84%
Key characteristics
| EMB | EMLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.87 | 0.23 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.72 | 0.38 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.04 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.78 | 0.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.08 | 0.68 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.41% | 2.58% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.56% | 7.71% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.70% | -32.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.27% | -18.99% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMB vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between EMB and EMLC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMB vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMB vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than EMLC's 6.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 4.96% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.90% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% | 4.56% | 4.75% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.38% | 5.96% | 5.68% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.26% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.31% | 6.26% | 5.98% | 5.18% |
Drawdowns
EMB vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than EMLC's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and EMLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMB vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) is 2.12%, while VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that EMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.