PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMB vs. EMHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMB vs. EMHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMB achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than EMHY's 3.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EMB has underperformed EMHY with an annualized return of 3.30%, while EMHY has yielded a comparatively higher 4.67% annualized return.


EMB

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.57%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.21%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
9.37%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
3.30%

EMHY

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.64%
YTD
3.26%
6M
3.35%
1Y
12.55%
3Y*
12.57%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
4.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMB vs. EMHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
2.18%13.85%5.54%10.62%-18.63%-2.23%5.42%15.48%-5.47%10.28%
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
3.26%13.70%11.97%11.47%-13.03%-1.91%3.83%12.98%-5.21%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EMB and EMHY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2012

0.80

The correlation between EMB and EMHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMB vs. EMHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EMHY
EMHY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EMHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMB vs. EMHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMBEMHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.90

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.26

13.15

-2.89

EMB vs. EMHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the EMHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMB and EMHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMB vs. EMHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMB drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, which is greater than EMHY's maximum drawdown of -30.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMB and EMHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMBEMHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-30.11%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-4.34%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

-5.95%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-25.83%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-30.11%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.47%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-4.88%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.96%

+0.10%

Volatility

EMB vs. EMHY - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF (EMHY) at 1.58%. This indicates that EMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMBEMHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.58%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

4.43%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

5.74%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.76%

9.11%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

10.66%

-0.70%

EMB vs. EMHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMHY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMB vs. EMHY - Dividend Comparison

EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than EMHY's 6.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.04%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%
EMHY
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yield Bond ETF
6.38%6.52%6.86%6.73%7.08%5.58%5.44%5.72%6.79%5.59%6.43%6.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EMB and EMHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EMB has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to EMHY (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMB dropped -34.70% vs EMHY's -30.11%.

On 10-year performance, EMHY leads with 4.67% vs 3.30% for EMB. On fees, EMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EMHY has performed better with a 4.67% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EMHY.

EMHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.38%, compared with 5.04% for EMB.

EMB tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index, while EMHY tracks J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets High Yield Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EMB and 0.50% for EMHY.

EMHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMB and EMHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer