PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRNA vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRNA vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRNA achieves a 54.76% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 8.90% return.


MRNA

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.60%
YTD
54.76%
6M
89.69%
1Y
68.72%
3Y*
-29.55%
5Y*
-25.22%
10Y*

JNJ

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
8.90%
6M
9.71%
1Y
47.01%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRNA vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
54.76%-29.08%-58.19%-44.63%-29.28%143.11%434.10%28.09%-17.90%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
8.90%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-11.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MRNA and JNJ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MRNA:

$18.03B

JNJ:

$545.01B

EPS

MRNA:

-$8.16

JNJ:

$8.65

PS Ratio

MRNA:

8.03

JNJ:

5.63

PB Ratio

MRNA:

2.43

JNJ:

6.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRNA:

$2.23B

JNJ:

$96.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRNA:

-$309.00M

JNJ:

$66.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

MRNA:

-$3.02B

JNJ:

$31.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRNA vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRNA
MRNA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MRNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRNA vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRNAJNJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

2.83

-1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

4.17

-2.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.51

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

4.31

-2.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.02

13.20

-9.18

MRNA vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRNA and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRNAJNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.83

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

0.54

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.53

-0.36

Drawdowns

MRNA vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRNA drawdown since its inception was -95.38%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRNA and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRNAJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.38%

-50.67%

-44.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.51%

-10.96%

-24.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.58%

-15.95%

-70.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.38%

-18.41%

-76.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.58%

-9.81%

-80.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.62%

-11.88%

-44.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.87%

3.58%

+14.29%

Volatility

MRNA vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) has a higher volatility of 17.07% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.36%. This indicates that MRNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRNAJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.07%

5.36%

+11.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.11%

12.19%

+35.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.55%

16.67%

+46.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.32%

16.82%

+49.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.89%

18.45%

+53.44%

Dividends

MRNA vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

MRNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.35%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MRNA vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moderna, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
389.00M
24.06B
(MRNA) Total Revenue
(JNJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MRNA and JNJ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNA has higher volatility (17.07%) compared to JNJ (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRNA dropped -95.38% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRNA and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer