MRAM vs. BWET
MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. Over the past 3 years, MRAM returned 19.96%/yr vs 133.24%/yr for BWET. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MRAM vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRAM achieves a 87.72% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,213.29% return.
MRAM
- 1D
- 12.75%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- 6M
- 58.51%
- YTD
- 87.72%
- 1Y
- 183.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 25.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.83%
BWET
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 48.34%
- 6M
- 622.65%
- YTD
- 1,213.29%
- 1Y
- 2,071.67%
- 3Y*
- 133.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 142.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.89M | $40.32M | $30.55M | |
| $18.53M | $18.78M | $103.28M |
MRAM vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MRAM Everspin Technologies, Inc. | 87.72% | 45.23% | -29.31% | 37.18% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 1,213.29% | 96.22% | -39.21% | 14.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRAM and BWET is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRAM vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
MRAM
BWET
MRAM vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRAM | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.90 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 50.91 | -48.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 191.06 | -185.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRAM vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRAM drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAM and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRAM | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -56.90% | -34.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.62% | -41.22% | -29.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.62% | -56.81% | -13.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.42% | -5.77% | -54.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.84% | -23.36% | -41.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.64% | 10.96% | +20.68% |
Volatility
MRAM vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) have volatilities of 32.39% and 31.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRAM | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.39% | 31.29% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.96% | 95.77% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.12% | 108.00% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.48% | 74.42% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.12% | 74.42% | +4.70% |
Dividends
MRAM vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRAM nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRAM and BWET have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRAM has higher volatility (32.39%) compared to BWET (31.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAM dropped -91.28% vs BWET's -56.90%.
BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.43 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRAM and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer