PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPGFX vs. VDIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPGFX vs. VDIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPGFX achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than VDIGX's 2.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MPGFX having a 12.74% annualized return and VDIGX not far behind at 12.52%.


MPGFX

1D
-0.80%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
7.81%
6M
7.00%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
12.74%

VDIGX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.51%
YTD
2.27%
6M
1.83%
1Y
9.47%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
12.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPGFX vs. VDIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
7.81%10.55%19.61%27.70%-21.28%29.42%16.80%28.40%-4.27%16.54%
VDIGX
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund
2.27%11.11%20.84%8.11%-4.89%24.86%12.04%30.94%0.08%19.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MPGFX and VDIGX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 1992

0.78

The correlation between MPGFX and VDIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (3 years) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPGFX vs. VDIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPGFX
MPGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MPGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MPGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

VDIGX
VDIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VDIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VDIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPGFX vs. VDIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPGFXVDIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.18

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.16

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

4.50

+4.80

MPGFX vs. VDIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the VDIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPGFX and VDIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPGFX vs. VDIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.00%, which is greater than VDIGX's maximum drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGFX and VDIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPGFXVDIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.00%

-45.23%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-9.09%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-10.23%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.87%

-16.18%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.08%

-32.98%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-1.04%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-6.64%

-8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.34%

+0.03%

Volatility

MPGFX vs. VDIGX - Volatility Comparison

Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX) at 3.09%. This indicates that MPGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPGFXVDIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

3.09%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.08%

7.80%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

10.22%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

13.88%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

15.72%

+2.41%

MPGFX vs. VDIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPGFX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VDIGX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPGFX vs. VDIGX - Dividend Comparison

MPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than VDIGX's 24.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
4.16%4.48%3.84%2.34%8.80%8.13%8.81%7.39%8.76%9.47%5.84%7.92%
VDIGX
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund
24.01%21.90%21.94%2.29%6.06%5.45%2.83%4.70%8.72%5.16%2.86%5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPGFX and VDIGX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPGFX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to VDIGX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPGFX dropped -61.00% vs VDIGX's -45.23%.

MPGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPGFX and VDIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer