PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MPGFX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MPGFX and FBGRX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

MPGFX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.97%
15.23%
MPGFX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MPGFX:

1.13

FBGRX:

1.31

Sortino Ratio

MPGFX:

1.58

FBGRX:

1.80

Omega Ratio

MPGFX:

1.21

FBGRX:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

MPGFX:

1.13

FBGRX:

1.84

Martin Ratio

MPGFX:

4.87

FBGRX:

5.58

Ulcer Index

MPGFX:

3.14%

FBGRX:

4.97%

Daily Std Dev

MPGFX:

13.45%

FBGRX:

21.04%

Max Drawdown

MPGFX:

-60.43%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

MPGFX:

-5.59%

FBGRX:

-2.54%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MPGFX having a 2.32% return and FBGRX slightly lower at 2.25%. Over the past 10 years, MPGFX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 5.37%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.


MPGFX

YTD

2.32%

1M

2.32%

6M

5.97%

1Y

16.70%

5Y*

7.63%

10Y*

5.37%

FBGRX

YTD

2.25%

1M

2.25%

6M

15.23%

1Y

28.72%

5Y*

15.98%

10Y*

13.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MPGFX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPGFX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for MPGFX: current value at 0.61% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.61%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MPGFX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MPGFX is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MPGFX is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MPGFX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.131.31
The chart of Sortino ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.581.80
The chart of Omega ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.211.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.131.84
The chart of Martin ratio for MPGFX, currently valued at 4.87, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.875.58
MPGFX
FBGRX

The current MPGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPGFX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.13
1.31
MPGFX
FBGRX

Dividends

MPGFX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

MPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than FBGRX's 0.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
0.85%0.87%0.83%0.86%0.56%1.07%1.24%1.50%1.37%1.42%1.60%1.32%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.23%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

MPGFX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPGFX drawdown since its inception was -60.43%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGFX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.59%
-2.54%
MPGFX
FBGRX

Volatility

MPGFX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) is 4.14%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that MPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.14%
7.21%
MPGFX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab