MPGFX vs. NICSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Nicholas Fund (NICSX).
MPGFX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Nov 7, 1958. NICSX is managed by Nicholas. It was launched on Jul 14, 1969.
Performance
MPGFX vs. NICSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MPGFX vs. NICSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPGFX Mairs & Power Growth Fund | -3.78% | 10.55% | 19.61% | 27.70% | -21.28% | 29.42% | 16.80% | 28.40% | -4.27% | 16.54% |
NICSX Nicholas Fund | -10.51% | 4.45% | 11.80% | 34.17% | -18.15% | 26.58% | 18.91% | 33.68% | -3.71% | 17.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPGFX achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly higher than NICSX's -10.51% return. Over the past 10 years, MPGFX has outperformed NICSX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while NICSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.26% annualized return.
MPGFX
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -3.77%
- 1Y
- 11.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
NICSX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -7.85%
- YTD
- -10.51%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- -2.60%
- 3Y*
- 8.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MPGFX vs. NICSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPGFX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than NICSX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MPGFX vs. NICSX — Risk / Return Rank
MPGFX
NICSX
MPGFX vs. NICSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and Nicholas Fund (NICSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPGFX | NICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | -0.13 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | -0.07 | +1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.99 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | -0.30 | +1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | -1.08 | +5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPGFX | NICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | -0.13 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.40 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.57 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.63 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between MPGFX and NICSX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MPGFX vs. NICSX - Dividend Comparison
MPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than NICSX's 10.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPGFX Mairs & Power Growth Fund | 4.66% | 4.48% | 3.84% | 2.34% | 8.80% | 8.13% | 8.81% | 7.39% | 8.76% | 9.47% | 5.84% | 7.92% |
NICSX Nicholas Fund | 10.30% | 9.22% | 3.97% | 6.81% | 2.26% | 11.84% | 6.76% | 8.13% | 5.38% | 15.55% | 3.63% | 6.19% |
Drawdowns
MPGFX vs. NICSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.00%, which is greater than NICSX's maximum drawdown of -50.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGFX and NICSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPGFX | NICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.00% | -50.20% | -10.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.21% | -13.20% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.87% | -25.32% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.08% | -33.44% | +0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -12.94% | +6.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -7.66% | -7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.71% | -0.83% |
Volatility
MPGFX vs. NICSX - Volatility Comparison
Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Nicholas Fund (NICSX) at 4.10%. This indicates that MPGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NICSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MPGFX | NICSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 4.10% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 8.86% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.89% | 16.96% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 17.33% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 17.93% | +0.14% |