PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPGFX vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPGFX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPGFX achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MPGFX has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 12.59%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


MPGFX

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.85%
YTD
9.32%
6M
10.06%
1Y
23.87%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
12.59%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPGFX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
9.32%10.55%19.61%27.70%-21.28%29.42%16.80%28.40%-4.27%16.54%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MPGFX and SPY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1993

0.88

The correlation between MPGFX and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPGFX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPGFX
MPGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MPGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MPGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPGFX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPGFXSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

2.38

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

3.24

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.16

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.54

14.72

-4.18

MPGFX vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPGFX and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPGFXSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.38

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.82

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.87

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.59

-0.27

Drawdowns

MPGFX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.00%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGFX and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPGFXSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.00%

-55.19%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-8.88%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-18.76%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.87%

-24.50%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.08%

-33.72%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.70%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-9.05%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.91%

+0.43%

Volatility

MPGFX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mairs & Power Growth Fund (MPGFX) is 2.54%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that MPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPGFXSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.84%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

8.90%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

11.83%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.05%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

17.94%

+0.15%

MPGFX vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPGFX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPGFX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

MPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPGFX
Mairs & Power Growth Fund
4.10%4.48%3.84%2.34%8.80%8.13%8.81%7.39%8.76%9.47%5.84%7.92%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MPGFX and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to MPGFX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPGFX dropped -61.00% vs SPY's -55.19%.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPGFX and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer