MPBFX vs. BIMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX).
MPBFX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 2, 2000. BIMSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000.
Performance
MPBFX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MPBFX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPBFX BNY Mellon Bond Fund | -0.45% | 7.20% | 1.08% | 5.48% | -13.55% | -1.50% | 7.87% | 8.82% | -0.53% | 3.91% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.14% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 6.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPBFX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than BIMSX's -0.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MPBFX has underperformed BIMSX with an annualized return of 1.59%, while BIMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.04% annualized return.
MPBFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.59%
BIMSX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MPBFX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MPBFX and BIMSX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Return for Risk
MPBFX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank
MPBFX
BIMSX
MPBFX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPBFX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.50 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 2.23 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.29 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.33 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 8.69 | -4.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPBFX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.50 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.30 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.63 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.09 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between MPBFX and BIMSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MPBFX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison
MPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, which matches BIMSX's 3.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPBFX BNY Mellon Bond Fund | 3.53% | 3.82% | 3.70% | 3.17% | 2.86% | 2.33% | 4.64% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.89% | 3.12% | 2.77% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.56% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
MPBFX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, which is greater than BIMSX's maximum drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPBFX and BIMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPBFX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -13.07% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -1.87% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -13.00% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.40% | -13.07% | -5.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -1.30% | -1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -1.59% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.50% | +0.41% |
Volatility
MPBFX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 1.03%. This indicates that MPBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MPBFX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 1.03% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 1.67% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20% | 2.80% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.83% | 3.86% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 3.24% | +1.58% |