PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPBFX vs. USIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPBFX vs. USIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPBFX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than USIG's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MPBFX has underperformed USIG with an annualized return of 1.56%, while USIG has yielded a comparatively higher 2.57% annualized return.


MPBFX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.48%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
1.56%

USIG

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.66%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.83%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
2.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPBFX vs. USIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPBFX
BNY Mellon Bond Fund
0.30%7.20%1.08%5.48%-13.55%-1.50%7.87%8.82%-0.53%3.91%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.71%7.86%2.56%8.71%-15.30%-1.34%9.44%13.99%-2.21%5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MPBFX and USIG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2007

0.80

The correlation between MPBFX and USIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPBFX vs. USIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPBFX
MPBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MPBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MPBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

USIG
USIG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
USIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
USIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPBFX vs. USIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPBFXUSIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.90

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

6.05

-1.62

MPBFX vs. USIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the USIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPBFX and USIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPBFX vs. USIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum USIG drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPBFX and USIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPBFXUSIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.40%

-22.21%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-2.79%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

-6.10%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-21.45%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.40%

-21.45%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-0.81%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-3.41%

+1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.88%

+0.12%

Volatility

MPBFX vs. USIG - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (USIG) at 1.14%. This indicates that MPBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPBFXUSIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.14%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

3.13%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74%

4.10%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.86%

6.82%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

6.83%

-1.98%

MPBFX vs. USIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPBFX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than USIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPBFX vs. USIG - Dividend Comparison

MPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than USIG's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPBFX
BNY Mellon Bond Fund
3.82%3.82%3.70%3.17%2.86%2.33%4.64%2.87%3.00%2.89%3.12%2.77%
USIG
iShares Broad USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.73%4.62%4.51%3.94%3.14%2.33%2.82%3.37%3.44%3.03%2.87%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MPBFX and USIG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MPBFX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to USIG (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPBFX dropped -18.40% vs USIG's -22.21%.

USIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPBFX and USIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer