MOTO vs. XT
MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MOTO is actively managed, while XT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTO returned 7.58%/yr vs 6.52%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
MOTO vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 15.68% return.
MOTO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 9.06%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.32%
XT
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.22K | $15.41K | $15.45K | |
| $6.36M | $6.26M | $10.28M |
MOTO vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 17.24% | 27.38% | 2.01% | 27.10% | -27.20% | 17.22% | 59.13% | 5.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 15.68% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTO and XT is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between MOTO and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
MOTO vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTO
XT
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
MOTO
XT
Consumer Cyclical
MOTO
XT
Industrials
MOTO
XT
Communication Services
MOTO
XT
Basic Materials
MOTO
XT
Consumer Defensive
MOTO
XT
Financial Services
MOTO
XT
Utilities
MOTO
XT
Energy
MOTO
-
XT
Healthcare
MOTO
-
XT
Real Estate
MOTO
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTO vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
MOTO
XT
MOTO vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTO | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.19 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 11.45 | -5.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTO vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTO | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -34.41% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -10.45% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | -22.09% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | -34.41% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.85% | -4.22% | -6.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -7.35% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 2.90% | +2.39% |
Volatility
MOTO vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 5.03%. This indicates that MOTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTO | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 5.03% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.79% | 14.41% | +6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.52% | 17.83% | +6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 21.09% | +3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 20.13% | +6.38% |
MOTO vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTO vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than XT's 7.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 0.90% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.08% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTO and XT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOTO has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to XT (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 7.58% vs 6.52% for XT. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 7.58% return vs 6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.90% for MOTO.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTO and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer