MOTO vs. FLGV
MOTO (SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF) and FLGV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTO is a Transportation Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management, while FLGV is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTO returned 8.94%/yr vs -0.17%/yr for FLGV. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOTO charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLGV.
Performance
MOTO vs. FLGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly higher than FLGV's 0.21% return.
MOTO
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 21.35%
- 6M
- 20.71%
- 1Y
- 43.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- —
FLGV
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
MOTO vs. FLGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 21.35% | 27.38% | 2.01% | 27.10% | -27.20% | 17.22% | 51.30% |
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 0.21% | 6.22% | 0.62% | 4.18% | -11.53% | -2.39% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTO and FLGV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020 | 0.03 |
The correlation between MOTO and FLGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTO vs. FLGV — Risk / Return Rank
MOTO
FLGV
MOTO vs. FLGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTO | FLGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.15 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 1.16 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 3.18 | +7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTO vs. FLGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than FLGV's maximum drawdown of -17.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and FLGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTO | FLGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -17.63% | -20.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.36% | -2.82% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.43% | -5.23% | -21.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | -15.26% | -22.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.73% | -5.40% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.93% | -8.70% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 1.02% | +2.89% |
Volatility
MOTO vs. FLGV - Volatility Comparison
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) has a higher volatility of 11.45% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) at 1.03%. This indicates that MOTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTO | FLGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.45% | 1.03% | +10.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.16% | 2.60% | +16.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.09% | 3.70% | +19.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 5.44% | +18.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.47% | 5.14% | +21.33% |
MOTO vs. FLGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTO vs. FLGV - Dividend Comparison
MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than FLGV's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 4.14% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.46% | 2.21% | 1.92% | 0.97% |
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 0.87% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTO and FLGV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOTO has higher volatility (11.45%) compared to FLGV (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTO dropped -38.24% vs FLGV's -17.63%.
On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 8.94% vs -0.17% for FLGV. On fees, FLGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 8.94% return vs -0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.
FLGV has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.87% for MOTO.
MOTO is categorized as Transportation Equities, while FLGV is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson Asset Management and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOTO and 0.09% for FLGV.
MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTO and FLGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer