MOTO vs. FLGV
Compare and contrast key facts about SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV).
MOTO and FLGV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MOTO is an actively managed fund by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. It was launched on Nov 15, 2019. FLGV is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 9, 2020.
Performance
MOTO vs. FLGV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MOTO vs. FLGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 3.49% | 27.38% | 2.01% | 27.10% | -27.20% | 17.22% | 61.67% |
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 0.19% | 6.22% | 0.62% | 4.18% | -11.53% | -2.39% | -0.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTO achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly higher than FLGV's 0.19% return.
MOTO
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 40.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FLGV
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MOTO vs. FLGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTO has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MOTO vs. FLGV — Risk / Return Rank
MOTO
FLGV
MOTO vs. FLGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOTO | FLGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 0.84 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 1.25 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.15 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 1.51 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.54 | 3.95 | +5.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOTO | FLGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 0.84 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.00 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | -0.13 | +0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTO and FLGV is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MOTO vs. FLGV - Dividend Comparison
MOTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FLGV's 4.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTO SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF | 1.02% | 1.06% | 1.07% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 0.55% | 2.71% |
FLGV Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF | 4.06% | 4.07% | 4.13% | 3.46% | 2.21% | 1.92% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
MOTO vs. FLGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTO drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, which is greater than FLGV's maximum drawdown of -17.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTO and FLGV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTO | FLGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.24% | -17.63% | -20.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -2.45% | -13.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | -15.26% | -22.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.12% | -5.41% | -4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -8.83% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 0.94% | +3.15% |
Volatility
MOTO vs. FLGV - Volatility Comparison
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) at 1.45%. This indicates that MOTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MOTO | FLGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.53% | 1.45% | +8.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.01% | 2.53% | +13.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.78% | 4.13% | +21.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.36% | 5.41% | +17.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.30% | 5.19% | +21.11% |