MOTI vs. SMH
MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOTI returned 6.45%/yr vs 37.78%/yr for SMH. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTI charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
MOTI vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a -10.36% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 71.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MOTI has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 6.45%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.78% annualized return.
MOTI
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -10.04%
- 1Y
- -1.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
SMH
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 71.86%
- 6M
- 69.95%
- 1Y
- 128.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.01%
- 5Y*
- 38.15%
- 10Y*
- 37.78%
MOTI vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | -10.36% | 25.01% | 1.94% | 10.18% | -6.93% | 0.03% | 7.24% | 17.63% | -13.92% | 34.27% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 71.86% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTI and SMH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MOTI and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOTI vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTI
SMH
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
MOTI
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
MOTI
SMH
-
Healthcare
MOTI
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
MOTI
SMH
-
Technology
MOTI
SMH
Basic Materials
MOTI
SMH
-
Communication Services
MOTI
SMH
-
Financial Services
MOTI
SMH
-
Energy
MOTI
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
MOTI
-
SMH
-
Utilities
MOTI
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTI vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
MOTI
SMH
MOTI vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOTI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.55 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 8.67 | -8.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 31.31 | -31.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOTI vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.70% | -84.96% | +48.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.61% | -14.93% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -35.74% | +19.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.77% | -45.30% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | -45.30% | +8.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.61% | -7.47% | -8.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.15% | -41.00% | +31.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.51% | 4.12% | +2.39% |
Volatility
MOTI vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) is 3.06%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.07%. This indicates that MOTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 19.07% | -16.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.08% | 29.12% | -18.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 34.88% | -20.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 35.82% | -18.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 32.96% | -15.14% |
MOTI vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTI vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF | 3.60% | 3.22% | 4.79% | 2.34% | 3.27% | 4.67% | 2.14% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 8.87% | 1.33% | 0.84% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTI and SMH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.07%) compared to MOTI (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.78% vs 6.45% for MOTI. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MOTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.78% return vs 6.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for MOTI.
MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
MOTI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. MOTI tracks Morningstar Global ex-US Moat Focus Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTI and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer