MOTI vs. EPIN

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

MOTI (VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF) and EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. MOTI is passively managed, while EPIN is actively managed. Over the past year, MOTI returned 9.33% vs 40.46% for EPIN. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOTI charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for EPIN.

Performance

MOTI vs. EPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTI achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than EPIN's 26.80% return.

MOTI

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 7.79%
• 6M: -2.03%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 1Y: 9.33%
• 3Y*: 8.12%
• 5Y*: 5.10%
• 10Y*: 7.05%
• ALL TIME*: 5.44%

EPIN

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 18.24%
• YTD: 26.80%
• 1Y: 40.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 37.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	$43.11K	$23.78K	$18.95K
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF	$159.40K	$183.16K	$337.60K

MOTI vs. EPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF	0.88%	10.11%
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	26.80%	14.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTI and EPIN is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.65

The correlation between MOTI and EPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOTI vs. EPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOTI	EPIN
Industrials	23.2%	20.6%
Consumer Defensive	22.8%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	7.0%
Technology	11.3%	29.6%
Healthcare	10.7%	8.2%
Communication Services	7.4%	1.0%
Basic Materials	6.8%	7.1%
Financial Services	4.4%	19.1%
Energy	-	3.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MOTI vs. EPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTI

MOTI Risk / Return Rank: 21
MOTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
MOTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
MOTI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
MOTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MOTI Martin Ratio Rank: 18

EPIN

EPIN Risk / Return Rank: 81
EPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTI vs. EPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) and Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOTI	EPIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.63	2.12	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	2.85	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.38	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	3.49	-2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.24	12.57	-11.33

MOTI vs. EPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the EPIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTI and EPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOTI vs. EPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTI drawdown since its inception was -36.70%, which is greater than EPIN's maximum drawdown of -11.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTI and EPIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOTI	EPIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.70%	-11.64%	-25.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.95%	-11.64%	-4.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.02%	0.00%	-5.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-1.91%	-7.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.54%	3.23%	+4.31%

Volatility

MOTI vs. EPIN - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF (MOTI) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) at 4.87%. This indicates that MOTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOTI	EPIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	4.87%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.16%	16.99%	-4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	19.15%	-4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.66%	18.35%	-0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.80%	18.35%	-0.55%

MOTI vs. EPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTI has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than EPIN's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOTI vs. EPIN - Dividend Comparison

MOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than EPIN's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	0.62%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOTI VanEck Vectors Morningstar International Moat ETF	3.19%	3.22%	4.79%	2.34%	3.27%	4.67%	2.14%	3.90%	3.73%	8.87%	1.33%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOTI and EPIN in my portfolio?

MOTI and EPIN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOTI or EPIN?

MOTI has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to EPIN (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTI dropped -36.70% vs EPIN's -11.64%.

Which ETF is better, MOTI or EPIN?

On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 40.46% vs 9.33% for MOTI. On fees, MOTI is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, EPIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOTI or EPIN?

Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 40.46% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOTI or EPIN?

MOTI is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOTI or EPIN?

MOTI has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.62% for EPIN.

What is the main difference between MOTI and EPIN?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for MOTI and 0.80% for EPIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.