MOTG vs. VOO
MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 6.27%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
MOTG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.
MOTG
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 9.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
MOTG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | -1.12% | 26.06% | 9.31% | 11.00% | -11.34% | 14.68% | 16.06% | 30.43% | -3.89% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTG and VOO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MOTG and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
MOTG vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTG
VOO
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
MOTG
VOO
Consumer Defensive
MOTG
VOO
Technology
MOTG
VOO
Healthcare
MOTG
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
MOTG
VOO
Financial Services
MOTG
VOO
Communication Services
MOTG
VOO
Basic Materials
MOTG
VOO
Energy
MOTG
-
VOO
Real Estate
MOTG
-
VOO
Utilities
MOTG
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MOTG
VOO
MOTG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOTG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.43 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 3.16 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 14.73 | -12.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOTG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 2.39 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.83 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.89 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
MOTG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -33.99% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -8.90% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -18.69% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.29% | -24.52% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | -0.70% | -5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -3.69% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 1.91% | +1.79% |
Volatility
MOTG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that MOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 2.84% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 8.90% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 11.80% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 16.81% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 18.01% | -0.16% |
MOTG vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 17.95% | 17.75% | 5.60% | 1.86% | 3.64% | 5.88% | 2.96% | 3.91% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTG and VOO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOTG has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 6.27% for MOTG. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.
MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTG and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer