MOTG vs. SMH
MOTG (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOTG is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOTG returned 6.27%/yr vs 39.21%/yr for SMH. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOTG charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
MOTG vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
MOTG
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 9.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
MOTG vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | -1.12% | 26.06% | 9.31% | 11.00% | -11.34% | 14.68% | 16.06% | 30.43% | -3.89% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOTG and SMH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between MOTG and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MOTG vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOTG
SMH
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
MOTG
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
MOTG
SMH
-
Technology
MOTG
SMH
Healthcare
MOTG
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
MOTG
SMH
-
Financial Services
MOTG
SMH
-
Communication Services
MOTG
SMH
-
Basic Materials
MOTG
SMH
-
Energy
MOTG
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
MOTG
-
SMH
-
Utilities
MOTG
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOTG vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
MOTG
SMH
MOTG vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOTG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.72 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 10.59 | -9.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 40.63 | -38.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOTG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 5.19 | -4.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 1.13 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.34 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
MOTG vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOTG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -84.96% | +53.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.56% | -14.93% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -35.74% | +20.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.29% | -45.30% | +21.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.54% | 0.00% | -6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -41.09% | +36.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 3.89% | -0.19% |
Volatility
MOTG vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 4.58%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOTG | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 11.47% | -6.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 24.29% | -13.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 30.56% | -16.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 35.01% | -19.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 32.57% | -14.72% |
MOTG vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOTG vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOTG VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF | 17.95% | 17.75% | 5.60% | 1.86% | 3.64% | 5.88% | 2.96% | 3.91% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOTG and SMH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to MOTG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 39.21% vs 6.27% for MOTG. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 39.21% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.
MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOTG and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer