PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.


MOTG

1D
-1.46%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
0.57%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOTG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
-1.12%26.06%9.31%11.00%-11.34%14.68%16.06%30.43%-3.89%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-8.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and QQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018

0.77

The correlation between MOTG and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTG
QQQ

Industrials

26.4%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

17.3%
7.7%

Technology

17.1%
53.8%

Healthcare

13.9%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
12.3%

Financial Services

7.3%
0.2%

Communication Services

6.7%
15.8%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Industrials

MOTG
26.4%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

MOTG
17.3%
QQQ
7.7%

Technology

MOTG
17.1%
QQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

MOTG
13.9%
QQQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MOTG
10.3%
QQQ
12.3%

Financial Services

MOTG
7.3%
QQQ
0.2%

Communication Services

MOTG
6.7%
QQQ
15.8%

Basic Materials

MOTG
1.1%
QQQ
1.1%

Energy

MOTG

-

QQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

MOTG

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

MOTG

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOTG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOTGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.45

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.51

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

13.49

-10.97

MOTG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOTGQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

2.64

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.81

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.41

+0.22

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-82.97%

+51.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-11.96%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-22.77%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

-35.12%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.54%

-0.26%

-6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-32.79%

+27.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

3.11%

+0.59%

Volatility

MOTG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.49%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

12.10%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

15.94%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

22.38%

-6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

22.29%

-4.44%

MOTG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.95%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
17.95%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOTG has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 6.27% for MOTG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for MOTG.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 17.95%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer