PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOTG vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOTG vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOTG achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -3.20% return.


MOTG

1D
1.36%
1M
6.68%
6M
3.28%
YTD
6.17%
1Y
12.74%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.96%

BIZD

1D
1.73%
1M
3.60%
6M
2.05%
YTD
-3.20%
1Y
-9.00%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
7.57%
ALL TIME*
6.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.98M$40.70M$41.29M
$14.07K$24.07K$42.57K

MOTG vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
6.17%26.06%9.31%11.00%-11.34%14.68%16.06%30.43%-3.89%
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-3.20%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MOTG and BIZD is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.58

The correlation between MOTG and BIZD shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOTG vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOTG
BIZD

Industrials

25.3%

-

Technology

18.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

17.7%

-

Healthcare

16.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%

-

Financial Services

7.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

5.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

MOTG
25.3%
BIZD

-

Technology

MOTG
18.8%
BIZD

-

Consumer Defensive

MOTG
17.7%
BIZD

-

Healthcare

MOTG
16.0%
BIZD

-

Consumer Cyclical

MOTG
8.5%
BIZD

-

Financial Services

MOTG
7.0%
BIZD
100.0%

Communication Services

MOTG
5.6%
BIZD

-

Basic Materials

MOTG
1.2%
BIZD

-

Energy

MOTG

-

BIZD

-

Real Estate

MOTG

-

BIZD

-

Utilities

MOTG

-

BIZD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOTG vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOTG
MOTG Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOTG vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOTGBIZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.94

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

-0.48

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.88

-0.80

+3.68

MOTG vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOTG and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOTG vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOTG and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOTGBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-55.44%

+23.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-18.99%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-22.56%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.29%

-22.91%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.14%

+14.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-6.85%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

11.24%

-6.81%

Volatility

MOTG vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF (MOTG) is 3.57%, while VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that MOTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOTGBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

5.62%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

15.32%

-3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

19.05%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

17.57%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

21.83%

-4.07%

MOTG vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOTG has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOTG vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

MOTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.72%, more than BIZD's 11.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
11.76%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
MOTG
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat ETF
16.72%17.75%5.60%1.86%3.64%5.88%2.96%3.91%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOTG and BIZD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIZD has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to MOTG (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOTG dropped -31.82% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

On 5-year performance, MOTG leads with 7.49% vs 5.46% for BIZD. On fees, MOTG is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, MOTG has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOTG has performed better with a 7.49% return vs 5.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOTG is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.

MOTG has the higher dividend yield at 16.72%, compared with 11.76% for BIZD.

MOTG is categorized as Global Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. MOTG tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for MOTG and 12.86% for BIZD.

MOTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOTG and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer