MOOD vs. MATE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MOOD charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.

Performance

MOOD vs. MATE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly lower than MATE's 17.81% return.

MOOD

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 7.23%
• YTD: 13.59%
• 1Y: 32.49%
• 3Y*: 19.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.20%

MATE

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: 8.49%
• YTD: 17.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	$90.69K	$212.59K	$176.45K
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	$508.55K	$604.31K	$738.84K

MOOD vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	13.59%	1.62%
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	17.81%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and MATE is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

MOOD vs. MATE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 85
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MATE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOOD vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOOD	MATE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	—	—

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than MATE's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and MATE.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOOD	MATE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-13.24%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-2.53%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-3.48%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOOD	MATE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	22.40%	-7.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.08%	22.40%	-10.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.08%	22.40%	-10.32%

MOOD vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOOD vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.35%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOOD and MATE in my portfolio?

MOOD and MATE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MOOD or MATE?

On fees, MOOD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOOD or MATE?

MOOD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOOD or MATE?

MOOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.

What is the main difference between MOOD and MATE?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MOOD and 0.97% for MATE.