MOOD vs. TBFG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG).

MOOD and TBFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MOOD is an actively managed fund by Relative Sentiment. It was launched on May 18, 2022. TBFG is an actively managed fund by The Brinsmere Funds. It was launched on Jan 12, 2024.

Performance

MOOD vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MOOD vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	6.71%	30.39%	13.70%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	-0.04%	14.56%	10.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than TBFG's -0.04% return.

MOOD

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -5.99%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 6M: 13.43%
• 1Y: 31.94%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TBFG

• 1D: 2.25%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: -0.04%
• 6M: 2.85%
• 1Y: 16.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOOD vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

TBFG

The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF

Return for Risk

MOOD vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 93
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 73
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOOD	TBFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	1.31	+0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	1.88	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.28	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	1.79	+1.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.99	7.97	+4.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOOD vs. TBFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the TBFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and TBFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOOD	TBFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	1.31	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	1.03	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and TBFG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MOOD vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than TBFG's 2.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.38%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.59%	2.65%	2.43%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than TBFG's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and TBFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOOD	TBFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.34%	-13.43%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	-9.19%	-0.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.29%	-5.55%	-1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-1.68%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	2.07%	+0.62%

Volatility

MOOD vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOOD	TBFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	5.03%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	7.78%	+5.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	12.36%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.18%	10.98%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.18%	10.98%	+1.20%