PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOO vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOO vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MOO tracks the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOO returned 7.00%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for SPTM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

MOO vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MOO has underperformed SPTM with an annualized return of 7.00%, while SPTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.21% annualized return.

MOO

1D
0.48%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.54%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
7.00%

SPTM

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.13%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		10.10%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%23.99%14.59%22.29%-6.03%21.75%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF		11.10%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-5.30%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and SPTM is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2007

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between MOO and SPTM has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOO vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOO
SPTM

Consumer Defensive

37.9%
4.8%

Basic Materials

26.2%
2.0%

Industrials

20.3%
9.4%

Healthcare

15.4%
8.6%

Communication Services

-

10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.3%

Energy

-

3.7%

Financial Services

-

12.1%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Technology

-

34.0%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOO
37.9%
SPTM
4.8%

Basic Materials

MOO
26.2%
SPTM
2.0%

Industrials

MOO
20.3%
SPTM
9.4%

Healthcare

MOO
15.4%
SPTM
8.6%

Communication Services

MOO

-

SPTM
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MOO

-

SPTM
10.3%

Energy

MOO

-

SPTM
3.7%

Financial Services

MOO

-

SPTM
12.1%

Real Estate

MOO

-

SPTM
2.3%

Technology

MOO

-

SPTM
34.0%

Utilities

MOO

-

SPTM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Often compared with MOO:
MOO vs. VEGIMOO vs. DBAMOO vs. KROPMOO vs. SPYMOO vs. VOOMOO vs. PHOMOO vs. FTAG
Often compared with SPTM:
SPTM vs. VTISPTM vs. SPYSPTM vs. VOOSPTM vs. ITOTSPTM vs. SCHGSPTM vs. BKLCSPTM vs. SCHD

Return for Risk

MOO vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MOOSPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.95
2.36

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.43
3.23

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.43

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.22

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

15.01

-11.13

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOO vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MOOSPTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.36

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.80

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.85

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.46

-0.24

Drawdowns

MOO vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than SPTM's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and SPTM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOOSPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.53%

-54.80%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-8.68%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-18.87%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

-24.14%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

-34.66%

-4.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.50%

-0.67%

-16.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-9.05%

-7.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.86%

+1.51%

Volatility

MOO vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 2.88%. This indicates that MOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOOSPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

2.88%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

8.92%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

11.88%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

16.87%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.03%

+0.16%

MOO vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOO vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than SPTM's 1.04% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		2.24%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF		1.04%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOO and SPTM have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOO has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

On 10-year performance, SPTM leads with 15.21% vs 7.00% for MOO. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.04% for SPTM.

MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.03% for SPTM.

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOO and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer