PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MOO vs. KROP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MOO vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while KROP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOO returned 1.40%/yr vs -0.71%/yr for KROP. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

MOO vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 12.74% return.

MOO

1D
-0.08%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
5.65%
6M
6.16%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
1.40%
5Y*
-0.97%
10Y*
7.05%

KROP

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
12.74%
6M
11.90%
1Y
10.05%
3Y*
-0.71%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		5.65%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%5.68%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF		12.74%7.95%-8.74%-23.86%-27.23%-19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and KROP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021

0.76

The correlation between MOO and KROP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

MOO vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MOO
KROP

Consumer Defensive

37.8%
27.1%

Basic Materials

25.2%
32.0%

Industrials

21.7%
40.4%

Healthcare

15.3%
0.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

MOO
37.8%
KROP
27.1%

Basic Materials

MOO
25.2%
KROP
32.0%

Industrials

MOO
21.7%
KROP
40.4%

Healthcare

MOO
15.3%
KROP
0.3%

Communication Services

MOO

-

KROP

-

Consumer Cyclical

MOO

-

KROP
0.3%

Energy

MOO

-

KROP

-

Financial Services

MOO

-

KROP

-

Real Estate

MOO

-

KROP

-

Technology

MOO

-

KROP

-

Utilities

MOO

-

KROP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF

Often compared with MOO:
MOO vs. VEGIMOO vs. DBAMOO vs. SPYMOO vs. VOOMOO vs. PHOMOO vs. FTAGMOO vs. PDBA
Often compared with KROP:
KROP vs. TSNKROP vs. COMKROP vs. DBAKROP vs. VGTKROP vs. CFKROP vs. VTIKROP vs. SCHB

Return for Risk

MOO vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
KROP
KROP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MOOKROPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.49
0.62

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.79
1.00

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.12

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

0.89

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.74

1.93

-0.20

MOO vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOO vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than KROP's maximum drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and KROP.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MOOKROPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.53%

-62.08%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-11.29%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-28.70%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.84%

-50.77%

+29.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-44.70%

+27.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

5.21%

-1.27%

Volatility

MOO vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is 3.35%, while Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that MOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MOOKROPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

4.80%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

12.44%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

16.19%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

22.24%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

22.24%

-4.04%

MOO vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOO vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than KROP's 2.42% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF		2.42%2.73%1.89%1.36%0.71%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF		2.34%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

MOO and KROP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KROP has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to MOO (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs KROP's -62.08%.

On 3-year performance, MOO leads with 1.40% vs -0.71% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MOO has performed better with a 1.40% return vs -0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 2.34% for MOO.

MOO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while KROP is Technology Equities. MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.50% for KROP.

KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOO and KROP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer