MOO vs. PHO
MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOO returned 7.05%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for PHO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PHO.
Performance
MOO vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MOO has underperformed PHO with an annualized return of 7.05%, while PHO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.
MOO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 1.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.97%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
PHO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -6.74%
- 1Y
- -1.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
MOO vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 5.65% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -8.57% | -8.10% | 23.99% | 14.59% | 22.29% | -6.03% | 21.75% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -4.80% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOO and PHO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MOO and PHO has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MOO vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOO
PHO
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
MOO
PHO
-
Basic Materials
MOO
PHO
Industrials
MOO
PHO
Healthcare
MOO
PHO
Communication Services
MOO
-
PHO
-
Consumer Cyclical
MOO
-
PHO
-
Energy
MOO
-
PHO
-
Financial Services
MOO
-
PHO
Real Estate
MOO
-
PHO
-
Technology
MOO
-
PHO
Utilities
MOO
-
PHO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOO vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
MOO
PHO
MOO vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOO | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.00 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | -0.11 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | -0.26 | +2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOO vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than PHO's maximum drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and PHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOO | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.53% | -55.62% | -13.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.75% | -13.78% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.83% | -19.19% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.52% | -28.60% | -10.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -34.92% | -4.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.84% | -10.06% | -10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.97% | -10.18% | -6.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 5.76% | -1.82% |
Volatility
MOO vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is 3.35%, while Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that MOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOO | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 4.38% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 11.31% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 15.20% | -1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 18.39% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 19.47% | -1.27% |
MOO vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOO vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than PHO's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.34% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.76% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOO and PHO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHO has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to MOO (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs PHO's -55.62%.
On 10-year performance, PHO leads with 11.81% vs 7.05% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PHO has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.76% for PHO.
MOO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PHO is Water Equities. MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.59% for PHO.
MOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOO and PHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer