MOO vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MOO returned 7.00%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for NLR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

MOO vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MOO has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 7.00%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.66% annualized return.

MOO

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 13.06%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: -0.70%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

NLR

• 1D: -4.59%
• 1M: -8.11%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 36.84%
• 3Y*: 35.11%
• 5Y*: 21.94%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	10.10%	15.61%	-12.43%	-8.57%	-8.10%	23.99%	14.59%	22.29%	-6.03%	21.75%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	6.14%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and NLR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2007	0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between MOO and NLR has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOO vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOO	NLR
Consumer Defensive	37.9%	-
Basic Materials	26.2%	-
Industrials	20.3%	15.1%
Healthcare	15.4%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Energy	-	46.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.5%
Utilities	-	37.4%

Return for Risk

MOO vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 27
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 25
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOO	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	0.88	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.43	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.17	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	1.43	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.88	2.93	+0.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOO vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOO	NLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	0.88	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.75	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.57	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.18	+0.05

Drawdowns

MOO vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOO	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.53%	-65.05%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.45%	-25.80%	+17.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.83%	-30.48%	+3.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.52%	-30.48%	-9.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.52%	-34.35%	-5.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.50%	-19.80%	+2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.97%	-35.72%	+18.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.37%	12.61%	-9.24%

Volatility

MOO vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is 4.08%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that MOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOO	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	13.18%	-9.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.57%	32.83%	-22.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.88%	42.32%	-28.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.12%	29.24%	-12.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.19%	24.02%	-5.83%

MOO vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOO vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than NLR's 2.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.24%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.40%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOO and NLR in my portfolio?

MOO and NLR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOO or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to MOO (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which ETF is better, MOO or NLR?

On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 13.66% vs 7.00% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOO or NLR?

Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 13.66% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOO or NLR?

MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOO or NLR?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 2.24% for MOO.

What is the main difference between MOO and NLR?

MOO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.56% for NLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.