PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOMO vs. RNST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MOMO vs. RNST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Momo Inc. (MOMO) and Renasant Corporation (RNST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOMO achieves a -4.20% return, which is significantly lower than RNST's 25.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MOMO has underperformed RNST with an annualized return of -4.09%, while RNST has yielded a comparatively higher 5.84% annualized return.


MOMO

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.04%
6M
-7.99%
YTD
-4.20%
1Y
-21.76%
3Y*
-11.88%
5Y*
-6.18%
10Y*
-4.09%
ALL TIME*
-3.64%

RNST

1D
0.53%
1M
1.37%
6M
16.96%
YTD
25.22%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
5.84%
ALL TIME*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.78M$3.16M$3.94M
$25.20M$28.13M$30.32M

MOMO vs. RNST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MOMO
Momo Inc.
-4.20%-10.17%21.75%-15.26%12.98%-32.96%-56.80%43.24%-2.98%33.19%
RNST
Renasant Corporation
25.22%0.98%9.12%-7.70%1.70%15.28%-1.62%20.24%-24.72%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MOMO and RNST is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.19

The correlation between MOMO and RNST shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MOMO:

$977.40M

RNST:

$3.98B

EPS

MOMO:

CN¥4.45

RNST:

$3.32

PE Ratio

MOMO:

9.09

RNST:

13.11

PS Ratio

MOMO:

0.65

RNST:

2.90

PB Ratio

MOMO:

0.60

RNST:

1.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

MOMO:

CN¥10.22B

RNST:

$1.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MOMO:

CN¥3.89B

RNST:

$470.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

MOMO:

CN¥1.70B

RNST:

$513.28M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOMO vs. RNST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOMO
MOMO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

RNST
RNST Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RNST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNST Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RNST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNST Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOMO vs. RNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Momo Inc. (MOMO) and Renasant Corporation (RNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOMORNSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.17

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

1.27

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.07

2.92

-3.99

MOMO vs. RNST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOMO Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the RNST Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOMO and RNST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOMO vs. RNST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOMO drawdown since its inception was -90.31%, which is greater than RNST's maximum drawdown of -73.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOMO and RNST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOMORNSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.31%

-73.06%

-17.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.61%

-17.19%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.73%

-29.28%

-21.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.90%

-41.15%

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.31%

-59.84%

-30.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.65%

-1.54%

-80.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.77%

-19.17%

-35.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.18%

7.51%

+14.67%

Volatility

MOMO vs. RNST - Volatility Comparison

Momo Inc. (MOMO) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Renasant Corporation (RNST) at 5.77%. This indicates that MOMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOMORNSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

5.77%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.84%

17.55%

+3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

25.93%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.36%

30.88%

+30.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.04%

32.70%

+26.34%

Dividends

MOMO vs. RNST - Dividend Comparison

MOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than RNST's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOMO
Momo Inc.
4.67%4.58%7.00%10.36%7.13%7.13%5.44%1.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNST
Renasant Corporation
2.11%2.53%2.46%2.61%2.34%2.32%2.61%2.46%2.65%1.79%1.68%1.98%

Financials

MOMO vs. RNST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Momo Inc. and Renasant Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MOMO vs. RNST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Momo Inc. and Renasant Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MOMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Momo Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.07M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

RNST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Renasant Corporation reported a gross profit of -264.35M and revenue of 291.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -90.7%.

MOMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Momo Inc. reported an operating income of 295.46M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

RNST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Renasant Corporation reported an operating income of -110.42M and revenue of 291.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.9%.

MOMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Momo Inc. reported a net income of 289.29M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

RNST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Renasant Corporation reported a net income of 87.09M and revenue of 291.57M, resulting in a net margin of 29.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MOMO and RNST have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOMO has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to RNST (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOMO dropped -90.31% vs RNST's -73.06%.

RNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOMO and RNST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer