MOG-A vs. GS
MOG-A (Moog Inc) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) are both stocks. MOG-A operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while GS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, MOG-A returned 22.17%/yr vs 23.14%/yr for GS. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MOG-A vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOG-A achieves a 60.37% return, which is significantly higher than GS's 16.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MOG-A having a 22.17% annualized return and GS not far ahead at 23.14%.
MOG-A
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- 6M
- 27.91%
- YTD
- 60.37%
- 1Y
- 104.72%
- 3Y*
- 55.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 22.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.91%
GS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- YTD
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 46.41%
- 3Y*
- 45.09%
- 5Y*
- 25.12%
- 10Y*
- 23.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.08B | $2.11B | $2.25B | |
MOG-A Moog Inc | $142.64M | $122.67M | $119.34M |
MOG-A vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOG-A Moog Inc | 60.37% | 24.46% | 36.82% | 66.63% | 9.79% | 3.39% | -6.14% | 11.41% | -10.24% | 32.23% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 16.98% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOG-A and GS is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1999 | 0.43 |
The correlation between MOG-A and GS shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.49 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MOG-A:
$12.35B
GS:
$300.43B
MOG-A:
$11.76
GS:
$67.36
MOG-A:
33.14
GS:
15.12
MOG-A:
2.95
GS:
1.96
MOG-A:
2.89
GS:
2.69
MOG-A:
5.62
GS:
1.86
MOG-A:
$4.32B
GS:
$117.94B
MOG-A:
$1.22B
GS:
$67.57B
MOG-A:
$482.43M
GS:
$31.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOG-A vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
MOG-A
GS
MOG-A vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moog Inc (MOG-A) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOG-A | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.25 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 2.25 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 6.94 | +9.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOG-A vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOG-A drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOG-A and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOG-A | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.21% | -78.84% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.82% | -19.42% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.21% | -30.90% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.21% | -32.84% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.71% | -48.75% | -14.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -11.60% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.26% | -22.57% | +6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 6.30% | +0.07% |
Volatility
MOG-A vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
Moog Inc (MOG-A) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) have volatilities of 14.65% and 14.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOG-A | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.65% | 14.38% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.14% | 26.02% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.18% | 31.51% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 28.60% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.50% | 30.06% | +6.44% |
Dividends
MOG-A vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
MOG-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than GS's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.67% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
MOG-A Moog Inc | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 0.95% | 1.17% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MOG-A vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moog Inc and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MOG-A vs. GS - Profitability Comparison
MOG-A - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moog Inc reported a gross profit of 360.65M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.3%.
GS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.24B and revenue of 38.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.7%.
MOG-A - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moog Inc reported an operating income of 163.22M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.
GS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.52B and revenue of 38.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
MOG-A - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moog Inc reported a net income of 152.03M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
GS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 6.63B and revenue of 38.43B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MOG-A and GS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOG-A has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to GS (14.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOG-A dropped -68.21% vs GS's -78.84%.
MOG-A currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOG-A and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer