MOG-A vs. WWD
MOG-A (Moog Inc) and WWD (Woodward, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MOG-A returned 22.17%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for WWD. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MOG-A vs. WWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOG-A achieves a 60.37% return, which is significantly higher than WWD's 19.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MOG-A has outperformed WWD with an annualized return of 22.17%, while WWD has yielded a comparatively lower 20.95% annualized return.
MOG-A
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- 6M
- 27.91%
- YTD
- 60.37%
- 1Y
- 104.72%
- 3Y*
- 55.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 22.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.91%
WWD
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -13.70%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 39.68%
- 3Y*
- 40.62%
- 5Y*
- 25.07%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
MOG-A Moog Inc | $142.64M | $122.67M | $119.34M |
| $294.13M | $263.68M | $299.57M |
MOG-A vs. WWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOG-A Moog Inc | 60.37% | 24.46% | 36.82% | 66.63% | 9.79% | 3.39% | -6.14% | 11.41% | -10.24% | 32.23% |
WWD Woodward, Inc. | 19.53% | 82.58% | 23.01% | 41.97% | -11.09% | -9.43% | 3.18% | 60.42% | -2.23% | 11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOG-A and WWD is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 1996 | 0.47 |
The correlation between MOG-A and WWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MOG-A:
$12.35B
WWD:
$21.49B
MOG-A:
$11.76
WWD:
$8.97
MOG-A:
33.14
WWD:
40.20
MOG-A:
2.95
WWD:
1.56
MOG-A:
2.89
WWD:
5.29
MOG-A:
5.62
WWD:
8.94
MOG-A:
$4.32B
WWD:
$4.19B
MOG-A:
$1.22B
WWD:
$277.40M
MOG-A:
$482.43M
WWD:
$766.46M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOG-A vs. WWD — Risk / Return Rank
MOG-A
WWD
MOG-A vs. WWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moog Inc (MOG-A) and Woodward, Inc. (WWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOG-A | WWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.22 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 2.24 | +3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 6.53 | +9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOG-A vs. WWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOG-A drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, smaller than the maximum WWD drawdown of -83.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOG-A and WWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOG-A | WWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.21% | -83.18% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.82% | -18.37% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.21% | -19.31% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.21% | -37.25% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.71% | -60.61% | -3.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -17.34% | +8.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.26% | -17.82% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 6.28% | +0.09% |
Volatility
MOG-A vs. WWD - Volatility Comparison
Moog Inc (MOG-A) has a higher volatility of 14.65% compared to Woodward, Inc. (WWD) at 12.81%. This indicates that MOG-A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOG-A | WWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.65% | 12.81% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.14% | 30.73% | -3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.18% | 37.91% | -4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.62% | 32.42% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.50% | 35.55% | +0.95% |
Dividends
MOG-A vs. WWD - Dividend Comparison
MOG-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than WWD's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOG-A Moog Inc | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 0.95% | 1.17% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WWD Woodward, Inc. | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.59% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.77% | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.81% |
Financials
MOG-A vs. WWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moog Inc and Woodward, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MOG-A vs. WWD - Profitability Comparison
MOG-A - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moog Inc reported a gross profit of 360.65M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.3%.
WWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported a gross profit of -608.07M and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -54.8%.
MOG-A - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moog Inc reported an operating income of 163.22M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.
WWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported an operating income of -326.92M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -29.5%.
MOG-A - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Moog Inc reported a net income of 152.03M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
WWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported a net income of 146.68M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MOG-A and WWD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOG-A has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to WWD (12.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOG-A dropped -68.21% vs WWD's -83.18%.
MOG-A currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOG-A and WWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer