MOG-A vs. WWD
MOG-A (Moog Inc) and WWD (Woodward, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, MOG-A returned 22.29%/yr vs 20.33%/yr for WWD. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MOG-A vs. WWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOG-A achieves a 53.58% return, which is significantly higher than WWD's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MOG-A has outperformed WWD with an annualized return of 22.29%, while WWD has yielded a comparatively lower 20.33% annualized return.
MOG-A
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 24.35%
- YTD
- 53.58%
- 6M
- 63.89%
- 1Y
- 106.38%
- 3Y*
- 55.16%
- 5Y*
- 34.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.29%
WWD
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 58.60%
- 3Y*
- 46.79%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 20.33%
MOG-A vs. WWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOG-A Moog Inc | 53.58% | 24.46% | 36.82% | 66.63% | 9.79% | 3.39% | -6.14% | 11.41% | -10.24% | 32.23% |
WWD Woodward, Inc. | 14.21% | 82.58% | 23.01% | 41.97% | -11.09% | -9.43% | 3.18% | 60.42% | -2.23% | 11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOG-A and WWD is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 1996 | 0.47 |
The correlation between MOG-A and WWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MOG-A:
$11.97B
WWD:
$21.19B
MOG-A:
$8.88
WWD:
$4.00
MOG-A:
42.04
WWD:
86.20
MOG-A:
3.75
WWD:
3.34
MOG-A:
2.87
WWD:
5.31
MOG-A:
5.70
WWD:
8.39
MOG-A:
$4.17B
WWD:
$4.00B
MOG-A:
$1.14B
WWD:
$526.56M
MOG-A:
$475.73M
WWD:
$706.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOG-A vs. WWD — Risk / Return Rank
MOG-A
WWD
MOG-A vs. WWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moog Inc (MOG-A) and Woodward, Inc. (WWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOG-A | WWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.51 | 1.69 | +1.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.35 | 2.70 | +1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.32 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 3.95 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.30 | 10.02 | +6.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOG-A | WWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51 | 1.69 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.72 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
MOG-A vs. WWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOG-A drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, smaller than the maximum WWD drawdown of -83.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOG-A and WWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOG-A | WWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.21% | -83.18% | +14.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.82% | -15.17% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.21% | -19.31% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.21% | -37.25% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.71% | -60.61% | -3.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.44% | +14.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.32% | -17.88% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 5.99% | +0.29% |
Volatility
MOG-A vs. WWD - Volatility Comparison
Moog Inc (MOG-A) and Woodward, Inc. (WWD) have volatilities of 10.31% and 9.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOG-A | WWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 9.82% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.55% | 27.63% | -4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.57% | 34.86% | -4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.19% | 31.85% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.29% | 35.28% | +1.01% |
Dividends
MOG-A vs. WWD - Dividend Comparison
MOG-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than WWD's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOG-A Moog Inc | 0.32% | 0.48% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 0.95% | 1.17% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WWD Woodward, Inc. | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.59% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.77% | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.81% |
Financials
MOG-A vs. WWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moog Inc and Woodward, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MOG-A vs. WWD - Profitability Comparison
MOG-A - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moog Inc reported a gross profit of 287.56M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
WWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported a gross profit of -292.16M and revenue of 1.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -26.8%.
MOG-A - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moog Inc reported an operating income of 124.57M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
WWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported an operating income of -159.42M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in an operating margin of -14.6%.
MOG-A - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moog Inc reported a net income of 81.84M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
WWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodward, Inc. reported a net income of -133.72M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in a net margin of -12.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MOG-A and WWD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOG-A has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to WWD (9.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOG-A dropped -68.21% vs WWD's -83.18%.
MOG-A currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOG-A and WWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer