MOG-A vs. XOM
MOG-A (Moog Inc) and XOM (Exxon Mobil Corporation) are both stocks. MOG-A operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while XOM operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, MOG-A returned 22.29%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for XOM. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MOG-A vs. XOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOG-A achieves a 53.58% return, which is significantly higher than XOM's 25.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MOG-A has outperformed XOM with an annualized return of 22.29%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.
MOG-A
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 24.35%
- YTD
- 53.58%
- 6M
- 63.89%
- 1Y
- 106.38%
- 3Y*
- 55.16%
- 5Y*
- 34.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.29%
XOM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- 25.96%
- 6M
- 31.37%
- 1Y
- 49.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 24.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
MOG-A vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOG-A Moog Inc | 53.58% | 24.46% | 36.82% | 66.63% | 9.79% | 3.39% | -6.14% | 11.41% | -10.24% | 32.23% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 25.96% | 15.98% | 11.26% | -6.26% | 87.41% | 57.58% | -36.21% | 7.23% | -15.09% | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOG-A and XOM is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 1992 | 0.29 |
The correlation between MOG-A and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MOG-A:
$11.97B
XOM:
$625.61B
MOG-A:
$8.88
XOM:
$5.93
MOG-A:
42.04
XOM:
25.23
MOG-A:
3.75
XOM:
1.17
MOG-A:
2.87
XOM:
1.96
MOG-A:
5.70
XOM:
2.46
MOG-A:
$4.17B
XOM:
$326.01B
MOG-A:
$1.14B
XOM:
$83.11B
MOG-A:
$475.73M
XOM:
$60.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOG-A vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank
MOG-A
XOM
MOG-A vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moog Inc (MOG-A) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOG-A | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.51 | 2.05 | +1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.35 | 2.61 | +1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.33 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.44 | 3.24 | +2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.30 | 9.35 | +6.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOG-A | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51 | 2.05 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.91 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.36 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.47 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
MOG-A vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOG-A drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, which is greater than XOM's maximum drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOG-A and XOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOG-A | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.21% | -62.40% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.82% | -15.69% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.21% | -18.92% | -14.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.21% | -20.51% | -12.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.71% | -61.34% | -2.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.19% | +12.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.32% | -10.20% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 5.44% | +0.84% |
Volatility
MOG-A vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison
Moog Inc (MOG-A) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) have volatilities of 10.31% and 9.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOG-A | XOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 9.91% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.55% | 20.26% | +3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.57% | 24.43% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.19% | 26.72% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.29% | 28.18% | +8.11% |
Dividends
MOG-A vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison
MOG-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than XOM's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOG-A Moog Inc | 0.32% | 0.48% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 0.95% | 1.17% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOM Exxon Mobil Corporation | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.57% | 3.68% | 3.22% | 5.70% | 8.44% | 4.92% | 4.74% | 3.66% | 3.30% | 3.69% |
Financials
MOG-A vs. XOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Moog Inc and Exxon Mobil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MOG-A vs. XOM - Profitability Comparison
MOG-A - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moog Inc reported a gross profit of 287.56M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
XOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a gross profit of 31.36B and revenue of 83.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
MOG-A - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moog Inc reported an operating income of 124.57M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
XOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported an operating income of 5.29B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
MOG-A - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Moog Inc reported a net income of 81.84M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
XOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exxon Mobil Corporation reported a net income of 4.18B and revenue of 83.16B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MOG-A and XOM have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOG-A has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to XOM (9.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOG-A dropped -68.21% vs XOM's -62.40%.
MOG-A currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOG-A and XOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer