MODL vs. UBND

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MODL (Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF) and UBND (VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MODL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Victory, while UBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Victory. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MODL returned 20.33%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for UBND. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MODL charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for UBND.

Performance

MODL vs. UBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MODL achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than UBND's 0.42% return.

MODL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 7.80%
• 6M: 8.04%
• 1Y: 24.87%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UBND

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.71%
• 1Y: 5.73%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MODL vs. UBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	7.80%	18.99%	24.73%	23.74%	7.13%
UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF	0.42%	7.79%	3.04%	7.37%	2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between MODL and UBND is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.24

Return for Risk

MODL vs. UBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MODL

MODL Risk / Return Rank: 64
MODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
MODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MODL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
MODL Martin Ratio Rank: 65

UBND

UBND Risk / Return Rank: 44
UBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
UBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UBND Omega Ratio Rank: 46
UBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
UBND Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MODL vs. UBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) and VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MODL	UBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.63	+0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.44	+0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.30	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.06	+0.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.07	6.61	+5.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MODL vs. UBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MODL Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the UBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MODL and UBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MODL	UBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	1.63	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.17	+1.42

Drawdowns

MODL vs. UBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MODL drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, which is greater than UBND's maximum drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODL and UBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	MODL	UBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.60%	-16.53%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.46%	-2.62%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.60%	-5.07%	-12.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-1.16%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-5.45%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	0.82%	+1.28%

Volatility

MODL vs. UBND - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF (MODL) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) at 1.26%. This indicates that MODL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MODL	UBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	1.26%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	2.44%	+5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	3.55%	+7.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	5.80%	+8.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.59%	5.80%	+8.79%

MODL vs. UBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

MODL has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than UBND's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MODL vs. UBND - Dividend Comparison

MODL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than UBND's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MODL Victoryshares Westend U.S. Sector ETF	0.67%	0.67%	0.83%	1.02%	0.39%	0.00%
UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF	4.76%	4.56%	4.63%	4.37%	3.28%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MODL and UBND in my portfolio?

MODL and UBND have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MODL or UBND?

MODL has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to UBND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MODL dropped -17.60% vs UBND's -16.53%.

Which ETF is better, MODL or UBND?

On 3-year performance, MODL leads with 20.33% vs 4.98% for UBND. On fees, UBND is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, UBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MODL or UBND?

Over the 3-year period, MODL has performed better with a 20.33% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MODL or UBND?

UBND is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MODL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MODL or UBND?

UBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.67% for MODL.

What is the main difference between MODL and UBND?

MODL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MODL and 0.40% for UBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MODL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.