PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBND vs. JCPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UBND vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UBND vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
-0.16%7.79%3.04%7.37%-12.72%0.12%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
0.23%7.98%2.96%7.13%-12.90%0.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBND achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than JCPB's 0.23% return.


UBND

1D
0.46%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
1.16%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
10Y*

JCPB

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
0.23%
6M
1.44%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UBND vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UBND vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBND
UBND Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
UBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBND Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
UBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBND Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBND vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBNDJCPBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.67

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.95

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.55

5.89

-0.34

UBND vs. JCPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the JCPB Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBND and JCPB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBNDJCPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.55

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between UBND and JCPB is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UBND vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison

UBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than JCPB's 4.94% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
4.66%4.56%4.63%4.37%3.28%0.28%0.00%0.00%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.94%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%

Drawdowns

UBND vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBND drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, roughly equal to the maximum JCPB drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBND and JCPB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UBNDJCPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-16.67%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-2.75%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-1.82%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-4.33%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.91%

-0.04%

Volatility

UBND vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) is 1.51%, while JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that UBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UBNDJCPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.74%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

2.57%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

4.34%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

5.36%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

5.08%

+0.79%