UBND vs. TOTL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UBND (VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF) and TOTL (State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UBND returned 4.91%/yr vs 4.39%/yr for TOTL. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UBND charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TOTL.

Performance

UBND vs. TOTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBND achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly higher than TOTL's -0.36% return.

UBND

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: 5.64%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TOTL

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: -0.38%
• 1Y: 4.78%
• 3Y*: 4.39%
• 5Y*: 0.62%
• 10Y*: 1.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBND vs. TOTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF	0.23%	7.79%	3.04%	7.37%	-12.72%	0.12%
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF	-0.36%	7.68%	3.15%	5.55%	-11.59%	-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between UBND and TOTL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021	0.86

The correlation between UBND and TOTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UBND vs. TOTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBND

UBND Risk / Return Rank: 45
UBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
UBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
UBND Omega Ratio Rank: 45
UBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
UBND Martin Ratio Rank: 43

TOTL

TOTL Risk / Return Rank: 36
TOTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
TOTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
TOTL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
TOTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
TOTL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBND vs. TOTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UBND	TOTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.40	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.07	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	1.58	+0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.89	4.88	+2.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UBND vs. TOTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the TOTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBND and TOTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UBND	TOTL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	1.40	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.38	-0.21

Drawdowns

UBND vs. TOTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBND drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, roughly equal to the maximum TOTL drawdown of -16.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBND and TOTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBND	TOTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.53%	-16.48%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.62%	-3.04%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.07%	-6.60%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-1.99%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-3.13%	-2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.98%	-0.16%

Volatility

UBND vs. TOTL - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF (TOTL) at 1.16%. This indicates that UBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBND	TOTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.16%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	2.45%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	3.44%	+0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.80%	5.59%	+0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.80%	4.78%	+1.02%

UBND vs. TOTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TOTL's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBND vs. TOTL - Dividend Comparison

UBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than TOTL's 5.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TOTL State Street DoubleLine Total Return Tactical ETF	5.29%	5.23%	5.35%	4.85%	4.68%	3.07%	2.91%	3.31%	3.41%	3.00%	3.25%	2.67%
UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF	4.77%	4.56%	4.63%	4.37%	3.28%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBND and TOTL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, UBND and TOTL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, UBND or TOTL?

UBND has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to TOTL (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBND dropped -16.53% vs TOTL's -16.48%.

Which ETF is better, UBND or TOTL?

On 3-year performance, UBND leads with 4.91% vs 4.39% for TOTL. On fees, UBND is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TOTL has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UBND or TOTL?

Over the 3-year period, UBND has performed better with a 4.91% return vs 4.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBND or TOTL?

UBND is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TOTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBND or TOTL?

TOTL has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 4.77% for UBND.

What is the main difference between UBND and TOTL?

They also come from different issuers: Victory and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UBND and 0.55% for TOTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.