MOB vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MOB (Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares) is a stock, while FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MOB vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOB achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 6.79% return.

MOB

• 1D: 6.85%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: -11.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOB vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MOB Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares	2.30%	-25.52%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	-5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MOB and FNGS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

MOB vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOB vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOB	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.15	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.75	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.12	—

Drawdowns

MOB vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOB drawdown since its inception was -50.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOB and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOB	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.00%	-48.98%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.61%	-9.63%	-22.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.98%	-10.85%	-19.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOB	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.19%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	112.49%	21.65%	+90.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	112.49%	30.10%	+82.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	112.49%	31.17%	+81.32%

Dividends

MOB vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither MOB nor FNGS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOB and FNGS in my portfolio?

MOB and FNGS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.