MOB vs. ALMU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU).

Performance

MOB vs. ALMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MOB vs. ALMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MOB Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares	-15.74%	-9.90%
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	-23.76%	6.78%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) MOB : $6.39M ALMU : $5.23M
Gross Profit (TTM) MOB : $3.72M ALMU : $2.62M
EBITDA (TTM) MOB : -$14.88M ALMU : -$5.05M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOB achieves a -15.74% return, which is significantly higher than ALMU's -23.76% return.

MOB

• 1D: 6.42%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: -15.74%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALMU

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -15.38%
• YTD: -23.76%
• 6M: -18.70%
• 1Y: 81.55%
• 3Y*: 53.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MOB vs. ALMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 70
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOB vs. ALMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mobilicom Limited American Depositary Shares (MOB) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOB	ALMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.54	0.63	-1.17

Correlation

The correlation between MOB and ALMU is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MOB vs. ALMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither MOB nor ALMU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MOB vs. ALMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOB drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, roughly equal to the maximum ALMU drawdown of -50.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOB and ALMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOB	ALMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.84%	-50.08%	+2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.49%	-45.55%	+1.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.69%	-23.46%	-2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	26.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MOB	ALMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	20.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	66.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	111.25%	114.06%	-2.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.25%	119.28%	-8.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.25%	119.28%	-8.03%

Financials