MNZL vs. VTI
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MNZL tracks the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
MNZL vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.83% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 11.83%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
MNZL vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.55% | 3.37% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.83% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and VTI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTI
MNZL vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -55.45% | +45.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -0.16% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -8.00% | +6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 12.80% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 17.51% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 18.28% | -1.28% |
MNZL vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than VTI's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.05% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MNZL and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.03% for VTI.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer