MNZL vs. UNOV
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MNZL tracks the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index while UNOV tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UNOV.
Performance
MNZL vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 5.56% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 18.20%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNOV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 13.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.20% | 2.90% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 5.56% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and UNOV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
UNOV
MNZL vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNZL | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.84 | 0.92 | +1.92 |
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum UNOV drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and UNOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -13.84% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.07% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -1.66% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.93% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 5.58% | +10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 6.83% | +8.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 7.72% | +8.01% |
MNZL vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and UNOV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UNOV.
MNZL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.
MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while UNOV tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.79% for UNOV.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and UNOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer