MNZL vs. RAFE
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and RAFE (PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MNZL tracks the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index while RAFE tracks the RAFI ESG US Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RAFE.
Performance
MNZL vs. RAFE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than RAFE's 15.78% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAFE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 13.43%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 1Y
- 28.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL vs. RAFE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.55% | 3.37% |
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF | 15.78% | 4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and RAFE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. RAFE — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RAFE
MNZL vs. RAFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | RAFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. RAFE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum RAFE drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and RAFE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | RAFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -35.74% | +26.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -6.13% | +4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.92% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. RAFE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | RAFE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 11.37% | +5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 15.06% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 19.33% | -2.33% |
MNZL vs. RAFE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than RAFE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. RAFE - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than RAFE's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 2.22% | 1.42% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and RAFE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RAFE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAFE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.
RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.30% for RAFE.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and RAFE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer