MNZL vs. MTUM
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
MNZL vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 18.20%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 11.94%
- YTD
- 30.30%
- 6M
- 29.99%
- 1Y
- 40.55%
- 3Y*
- 34.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
MNZL vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.20% | 2.90% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 30.30% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and MTUM is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
MTUM
MNZL vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNZL | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.84 | 0.84 | +2.00 |
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -34.08% | +24.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -1.10% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | -6.21% | +4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 19.08% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 20.60% | -4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 21.03% | -5.30% |
MNZL vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and MTUM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.15% for MTUM.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer