MNZL vs. IUS
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MNZL tracks the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index while IUS tracks the Invesco Strategic US Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.
Performance
MNZL vs. IUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MNZL having a 18.55% return and IUS slightly lower at 17.86%.
MNZL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUS
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 17.86%
- 1Y
- 30.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.55% | 3.37% |
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 17.86% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and IUS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IUS
MNZL vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and IUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -34.67% | +25.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -3.83% | +2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.49% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 10.61% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 15.01% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 17.97% | -0.97% |
MNZL vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than IUS's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.26% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and IUS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.
IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.19% for IUS.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and IUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer