MNZL vs. FTIF

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF).

MNZL and FTIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MNZL is a passively managed fund by Manzil that tracks the performance of the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. It was launched on Nov 18, 2025. FTIF is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 13, 2023. Both MNZL and FTIF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MNZL vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MNZL vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF	-1.26%	2.90%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	19.07%	3.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 19.07% return.

MNZL

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: -1.26%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 6M: 22.37%
• 1Y: 31.23%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNZL vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

FTIF

First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF

MNZL

Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF

Return for Risk

MNZL vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 72
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNZL vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNZL	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.68	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between MNZL and FTIF is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MNZL vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FTIF's 1.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF	0.04%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.17%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%

Drawdowns

MNZL vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNZL	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-27.83%	+18.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.99%	-1.03%	-4.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-6.28%	+4.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNZL	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.61%	22.97%	-7.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.61%	19.27%	-3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.61%	19.27%	-3.66%