MNZL vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. MNZL is passively managed, while BCI is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.

Performance

MNZL vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 25.35% return.

MNZL

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 8.16%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 6M: 16.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 25.35%
• 6M: 24.07%
• 1Y: 37.16%
• 3Y*: 15.51%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNZL vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF	18.20%	2.90%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	25.35%	1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MNZL and BCI is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

MNZL vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 70
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNZL vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNZL	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.84	0.47	+2.37

Drawdowns

MNZL vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNZL	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-32.69%	+23.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.61%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-5.52%	+4.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.74%	-12.00%	+10.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNZL	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.73%	16.96%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	16.81%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	15.65%	+0.08%

MNZL vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNZL vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BCI's 13.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.15%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNZL and BCI in my portfolio?

MNZL and BCI have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MNZL or BCI?

On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNZL or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNZL or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.15%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.

What is the main difference between MNZL and BCI?

MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.25% for BCI.