PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNZL vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNZL vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.93% return.


MNZL

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.37%
6M
16.46%
YTD
18.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS

1D
0.41%
1M
2.12%
6M
9.01%
YTD
10.93%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNZL vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MNZL and BBUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNZL vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNZL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNZL vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNZLBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.10

MNZL vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNZL vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNZLBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-35.35%

+25.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.45%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-5.41%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

Volatility

MNZL vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNZLBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.00%

12.55%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

17.14%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

19.54%

-2.54%

MNZL vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNZL vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
MNZL
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MNZL and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.

MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.02% for BBUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNZL and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer