PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNTK vs. CMBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNTK vs. CMBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNTK achieves a -6.59% return, which is significantly lower than CMBT's 75.48% return.


MNTK

1D
2.63%
1M
0.65%
YTD
-6.59%
6M
-12.85%
1Y
-25.00%
3Y*
-39.52%
5Y*
-28.74%
10Y*

CMBT

1D
4.52%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
75.48%
6M
78.43%
1Y
81.69%
3Y*
10.83%
5Y*
19.35%
10Y*
13.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNTK vs. CMBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MNTK
Montauk Renewables, Inc.
-6.59%-58.04%-55.33%-19.22%7.61%-21.15%
CMBT
Cmb.Tech NV
75.48%-2.30%-35.19%17.73%93.21%8.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MNTK and CMBT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

0.16

The correlation between MNTK and CMBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

MNTK:

$0.02

CMBT:

$1.91

PE Ratio

MNTK:

75.52

CMBT:

8.37

PEG Ratio

MNTK:

0.61

CMBT:

0.19

PS Ratio

MNTK:

0.93

CMBT:

2.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNTK:

$180.21M

CMBT:

$1.95B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNTK:

$51.29M

CMBT:

$698.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

MNTK:

$36.19M

CMBT:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNTK vs. CMBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNTK
MNTK Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CMBT
CMBT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CMBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMBT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CMBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMBT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNTK vs. CMBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNTKCMBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.30

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

4.19

-4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

9.56

-10.25

MNTK vs. CMBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNTK Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the CMBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNTK and CMBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNTK vs. CMBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNTK drawdown since its inception was -94.49%, which is greater than CMBT's maximum drawdown of -57.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTK and CMBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNTKCMBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.49%

-57.21%

-37.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.67%

-19.58%

-39.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.61%

-57.21%

-32.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.49%

-57.21%

-37.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.32%

-7.32%

-85.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.63%

-25.17%

-32.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.35%

8.58%

+27.77%

Volatility

MNTK vs. CMBT - Volatility Comparison

Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) at 12.21%. This indicates that MNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNTKCMBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.12%

12.21%

+4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.28%

29.57%

+20.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.22%

41.91%

+35.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.92%

43.12%

+29.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.29%

41.03%

+32.26%

Dividends

MNTK vs. CMBT - Dividend Comparison

MNTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMBT
Cmb.Tech NV
5.64%0.52%25.18%12.23%0.70%1.35%20.75%0.96%1.73%3.03%17.23%6.35%
MNTK
Montauk Renewables, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MNTK vs. CMBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Montauk Renewables, Inc. and Cmb.Tech NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
46.43M
513.16M
(MNTK) Total Revenue
(CMBT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MNTK vs. CMBT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Montauk Renewables, Inc. and Cmb.Tech NV over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-80.0%-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
34.5%
Portfolio components
MNTK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Montauk Renewables, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 46.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CMBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported a gross profit of 176.90M and revenue of 513.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.5%.

MNTK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Montauk Renewables, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.60M and revenue of 46.43M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.4%.

CMBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported an operating income of 149.46M and revenue of 513.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

MNTK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Montauk Renewables, Inc. reported a net income of 5.00K and revenue of 46.43M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

CMBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported a net income of 364.24M and revenue of 513.16M, resulting in a net margin of 71.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MNTK and CMBT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNTK has higher volatility (17.12%) compared to CMBT (12.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTK dropped -94.49% vs CMBT's -57.21%.

CMBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNTK and CMBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer